Who is more dangerous?

I know I am gonna piss people off (mostly Moonbat Libs) but it must be done>

Your Honor, if it pleases the court, I want this entered as Evidence #1.

Shawn Sherwin Labeet.
Scumbag who shot and killed a Miami-Dade Police Officer and wounded three more.
His use of a so-called "Assault Rifle" has led to Moonbats everywhere to demand the destruction of the Second Amendment. Shawn Sherwin Labeet was taken down by police and saved the Miami-Dade taxpayers lots of money.

And now Your Honor, I present Evidence #2

Seung Hui Cho
Student at Virginia Tech who committed the mass murder of 32 people with two handguns. Again, Moonbats everywhere demanded the elimination of weapons in civilian possession. Seung Hui Cho took the easy way out and capped his own sorry ass saving the Commonwealth of Virginia a decent amount of cash.

And now, I present to the Court Evidence #3

Michael Isikoff
investigative journalist for Newsweek. On May 1, 2005 Michael Isikoff's story about guards at Guantanamo Bay flushing a Koran down the toilet appeared in Newsweek. The story turned out to be false and Newsweek retracted but at the end, some 60 people were killed during riots in different Muslim countries. Mr. Isikoff's story actually killed more people than Seung Hui Cho & Shawn Sherwin Labeet combined. You would think that Mr. Isikoff should be in jail right now serving a lengthy prison sentence for being more dangerous that 2 cold blooded killers but no, after basically saying "Oops! I screwed up, my bad!" Mr. Isikoff is not only free but still delving as Journalist.

So, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, I ask: Who is more dangerous? The answer is not only easy but logical. Unfortunately Mr. Isikoff's allies in the MainStream Media will not denounce him for the mass murderer he is but will blame inanimate objects such as guns as the true dangers of our time. Why they do not apply the same adjectives to Mr. Isikoff's computer & word processing software is beyond rational understanding.